您的当前位置:首页正文

Quark model and strange baryon production in heavy ion collisions

2021-10-07 来源:我们爱旅游
8991 guA 72 1v4348089/hp-pe:hviXraQuarkmodelandstrangebaryonproductioninheavyioncollisions

A.Bialas

M.SmoluchowskiInstituteofPhysicsJagellonianUniversity,Cracow∗

February7,2008

Abstract

Itispointedoutthattherecentdataonstrangebaryonandan-tibaryonproductioninPb-Pbcollisionsat159GeV/cagreewellwiththehypothesisofanintermediatestateofquasi-freeandrandomlydistributedconstitutentquarksandantiquarks.AlsotheS-Sdataareconsistentwiththishypothesis.Thep-Pbdatafollowadifferentpattern.

Recently,ratherprecisedataonstrangebaryonandantibaryonproduc-tioninthecentralrapidityregionofPb-Pbandp-PbcollisionswerepresentedbytheWA97collaboration[1].InthisnoteIwouldliketopointoutthatthesePb-Pbdataagreeratherwellwithasimplequark-countingrulewhereasthep-Pbdatafollowadifferentpattern.Thisobservationimpliesthatthequarkdegreesoffreedomaremuchmorerelevantincollisionsoftwoheavynucleithanin”elementary”hadronicinteractions.Itthussupportsthein-terpretationofthedataonstrangenessproductioninPb-Pbcollisionsasanevidenceforcreationofthequark-gluonplasma[2,3].

OurargumentisanapplicationoftheoldideaproposedfirstbyRafelski[4].Consideringasystemofpartonsinthermodynamicequilibrium(i.e.quark-gluonplasma),heobservedthatstrange(andantistrange)particle

abundancesmustsatisfyahostofsimplerelations.Belowweconsidersomeoftheserelationswhichhaveavirtueofbeingrathergeneral,independentoftheassumptionofthermalequilibriumbut-ontheotherhand-sensitivetothequarkdegreesoffreedom.

Toexplaintheargument,letusformulatethequarkcountingrulewearetalkingabout.Wesimplyassumethatprobabilityofcreationofabaryon(oranantibaryon)withagivenquarkcontentisproportionaltotheprobabilitythatthreequarks(orantiquarks)withappropriatequantumnumbershappentomeetatacertainregionofphase-space-necessaryforthebindingtotakeplace.Assumingfurthermorethatthequarksareuncorrelated1,weobtainthefollowingrelativeprobabilities:

p=ωpq3;

Λ/Σ0=ωΛq2s;

Ξ=ωΞqs2;

Ω=ωΩs3

(1)

whereqandsarerelativeprobabilitiestofindalightquarkandastrangequarkinthesuitablephase-spaceregion.Analogousformulaearevalidforantibaryons.ωiaretheproportionalityfactorstakingintoaccounttheeffectsofresonancestructureandofthebindingenergyinformationofvariousbaryons.Thesefactors,generallydifferentfordifferentbaryons,areratherdifficulttocalculateandthereforethecomparisonofEqs(1)withexperimentisratherinvolvedanddependsonfurtherassumptions[2,5].

Onemayobserve,however,thattheseω-factorsareidenticalforabaryonandthecorrespondingantibaryon.Consequently,ifoneconsidersonlytheratiosoftheantibaryontobaryonrates,theω-factorscancel[4,6]andthediscussionbecomesmuchsimpler.Thisiswhatwearegoingtodo.Wethushave

(2)

q3and

¯/Σ¯Λ

p

where

D=

1

D;

¯Ξ

p

D;

2

¯Ω

p

D3

(3)

qs¯

Boththeseassumptionsarevalidinthermalequilibrium.Theinverseisnottrue,

however.

2

Fromtheseequationsweseethatthefourratiosin(2)and(3)areexpressedintermsoftwoparameters.Thereforewehavetwoconstraintswhichmustbesatisfiedbythedata.

LetusfirstdiscussthedataforPb-PbcollisionsatCERNSPS.Thedataof[1]givethefollowingvaluesforstrangeantibaryon/baryonratiosinthecentralrapidityregion

Λ

¯/Σ¯Ξ

=.249±.019;

¯p

=.07±.01(6)

Dividingtheratios(5)bytheratio(6)andusing(3)wehave

DΛ=1.9±.3;

DΞ=1.89±.15;

DΩ=1.76±.15

(7)

andthusweseethatthethreevaluesoftheparameterDobtainedfromthedataareingoodagreementwitheachotheruptheexperimentalaccuracyofabout10percent.

From(6)wealsodeducethat

s

=.75±.06(9)wherewehaveusedtheaverageofthethreevaluesforDgivenin(7),i.e.D=1.83±.10.Theratios(8)and(9)areingoodagreementwiththoseobtainedin[8]fromathermalfittothedata2

ThiscompletestheanalysisofthePb-Pbdata.Letusnowturntothep-Pbcollisions.

ThedataofWA97coll.[1]give

Λ

¯/Σ¯Ξ

=.33±.03;

(10)

¯/Ωisnotgivenin[1].ThepTheΩ¯/pratiowasmeasuredbyNA44collabo-ration[9],withtheresult

p

=.12±.01;

¯/Σ¯Λ

Ξ

=.55±.07.(13)

Sothatweobtain

DΛ=1.83±.17;

DΞ=2.14±.16

(14)

ThustheagreementwithEqs(2)and(3)isnotbad,althoughnotasgood

asinthecaseofPb-Pbcollisions.

UsingtheaveragevalueD=1.99±.12andq¯/q=.49±.02weobtains¯/s=.98±.07ingoodagreementwiththeanalysisof[13]wherethedataon

centralrapidityregioninS−Scollisionswerediscussedusingthethermalmodel.ItisalsointerestingtonotethattheobtainedvalueoftheparameterDisnotinconsistentwiththatfoundfromthePb-Pbdata.ThiscertainlysupportstheideathatalreadyinS−Scollisionsthebaryonandantibaryonproductionprocessproceedsthroughanintermediaterandomq−q¯system.Thisobservation,inturn,strenghtenstheevidenceforquark-gluonplasmaphasepresentalreadyincollisionsoflightnuclei.

Wewouldliketoclosethispaperwiththefollowingcomments.

(i)Althoughweconsideronlybaryonandantibaryonproduction,itis

¯production.TakingintotemptingtoextendtheargumentalsotoKandK

account(4),weobtain

K

≡D.(15)sq¯Thedata[12]and[14]give

󰀁

K

¯K

󰀂

Pp−Pb

≈1.8(noerrorgiven)(16)

WeseethattheseresultsarenotindisagreementwiththevaluesofD

foundfrombaryon-antibaryondatainS−SandPb−Pbcollisions4.

(ii)TheadvantageofourargumentisthattheEqs(2)-(4)canbeappliedtoanyphasespaceregion(ofcoursethespecificparametersmaydependontheregion).Whentheappropriatedataareavailable,itshallbethuspossibletotesttherelevanceofthequarkdegreesoffreedomalsooutsidethecentralrapidityregionconsideredhere.Onemayhopeinthiswaytodeterminethekinematicdomainwheretheparticlesaredominantlyproducedbytheintermediatestepofquark-gluonplasma.Furthermore,thisshouldallowtodeterminetherapiditydependenceofthebasicratios¯/s.ThislastpointisparticularlyinterestinginviewoftherecentsuggestionbyLetessierandRafelski[15]thattheobserveddeviationofs¯/sfromunityisareflectionoftheCoulombinteractions.

(iii)Ourargumentassumesthattheproductionofallbaryonsandan-tibaryonsinthecentralrapidityregionofheavyioncollisionsproceedsbyacommonmechanism,i.e.”coalescence”oftheindependentlydistributedquarksandantiquarks.RecentanalysisofthethermalmodelbyLetessier

andRafelski[15],basedonthePb−Pbdataextrapolatedtofullphase-space,(andincludingCoulombcorrectionswhichmodifysomewhattherelations

¯maydif-(2)-(4)),indicatesthattheconditionsforproductionofΩandΩ

ferfromthoseofotherbaryons.Thisiscertainlyaseriouspossibility.Thepresentexperimentalaccuracydoesnotyetallow,however,todrawdefiniteconclusionsaboutthisproblem.

(iv)Wewouldliketorepeatthattherelations(2)-(4)areindependentoftheassumptionofthermalequilibrium.Whenthermalequilibriumisaddi-tionallyassumed,onemayproducemanymorespecificpredictions,asdis-cussedindetailin[6,13].Inparticular,itispossibletocalculatetheratiosoftheratesofparticleswithdifferentstrangenescontent,ataskwhichisclearlybeyondthescopeofthepresentinvestigation.Wefeel,however,thatoursimpleargumentcanstillserveausefulpurposeofconvincingalaymanthatthequarkdegreesoffreedomareessentialforacorrectdescriptionofparticleproductioninheavyioncollisions.Acknowledgements

IwouldliketothankB.Mullerforraisingmyinterestinthesubject.ThediscussionswithF.Beccatini,R.Caliandro,R.Lietava,E.Quercigh,J.RafelskiandK.Zalewskiarehighlyappreciated.ThanksarealsoduetoM.MorandoandE.QuercighforaverykindhospitalityatthePadovameetingonStrangenessinQuarkMatter,wherepartofthisworkwasdone.ThisinvestigationwassupportedinpartbytheKBNGrantNo2P03B08614.

References

[1]WA97coll.,datapresentedbyR.CaliandroandR.LietavaattheSym-posium”StrangenessinQuarkMatter”,Padova,July1998.[2]Forareview,andafulllistofreferences,seeJ.Rafelski,J.Letessierand

A.Tounsi,ActaPhys.PolB27(1996)1035;ActaPhys.Pol.B28(1997)2841.[3]M.Gazdzicki,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.23(1997)1881;M.Gazdzicki

andM.Gorenstein,hep-ph/9803462.[4]J.Rafelski,Phys.Lett.B262(1991)333.

6

[5]F.Becattini,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.23(1997)1933.[6]J.Letessieretal.,Phys.Rev.D51(1995)3408.

[7]M.Kaneta,forNA44coll.,I.G.Beardenetal.,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.

23(1997)1865[8]J.LetessierandJ.Rafelski,Phys.Lett.B410(1997)315.[9]NA44coll.,I.G.Beardenetal.,Phys.RevC57(1998)837.

[10]J.Zimanyi,T.BiroandP.Levai,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.23(1997)

1941;T.Biro,P.LevaiandJ.Zimanyi,hep-ph/9807303,hep-ph/9808394.[11]R.LietavaandJ.Pisut,Eur.Phys.J.C5(1998)135andreferencesquoted

there;J.PisutandN.Pisutova,ActaPhys.Pol.B28(1997)2817;R.Lietavaetal.,hep-ph/9806414.[12]M.VenadesforWA94coll.,S.Abatsisetal.,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.

23(1997)1857.[13]J.Sollfrank,J.Gazdzicki,U.HeinzandJ.Rafelski,Z.Phys.C61(1994)

659.[14]C.BormannfortheNA49coll.,J.Phys.G:Nucl.Part.Phys.23(1997)

1817.[15]J.LetessierandJ.Rafelski,hep-ph/9807346.

7

因篇幅问题不能全部显示,请点此查看更多更全内容